Post

Andrew F
@aftd.dev

> if the defendant possesses anything that is inherently dangerous, as specified under the "ultrahazardous" definition, the defendant is then strictly liable for any damages caused by such possession I dunno, maybe we just take them at their word that LLMs are super dangerous.

en.wikipedia.orgStrict liability - Wikipedia
Elise Thomas@elisethomas.bsky.social

If an individual did this, we'd treat it as a crime. We should treat this as a crime too, and hold OpenAI liable for what its models, under its supervision, did. www.abc.net.au/news/2026-09...

abc.net.auOpenAI agent hacked Medicare portal, PM saysAnthony Albanese says he has spoken to the Open AI chief executive to express his concern about the incident and the length of time it took the tech company to inform the government of the breach.

0 reposts0 likes

No replies yet.