Post

it is nearly impossible for new artists, animators, or programmers to share their work without a swath of people accusing it of being AI. the only way to avoid that is to have proof that your project existed before gen AI. i think this ignorance ultimately helps normalize AI more than anything.

28 reposts95 likes

Food for thought: AI art has influenced the public zeitgeist and has become part of the modern style. The brainrot has bled out into lighting techniques, proportions, and especially references. The algo is no longer just running on machines.

Further, the consumer has got so wary of AI artist cosplay that it's causing us to shoot at shadows in our own houses. I was on Amazon recently and I had to minutely inspect the paragraphs of text and the images to determine if any of the products were real. Maybe 50% were fake.

Gatekeeping is now more important than ever, but those filters also scare and remove new artists who are not yet able to defend their work. They are catching the bullets intended for the fleshcloaked botproxies.

Training and scraping has stopped a lot of real artists posting online entirely, only serving to increase the ratio of deceptively created materials to real artists. It's not the fault of the inquisitors. Like punk, pixelart, and hashtags, parasites have once again soiled the scene.

artists used to be able to be mysterious. a work would just show up. where did it come from? some guy in japan released it. any more info? nope, just an origin and a piece of work

it seems like you can’t really do that anymore. :( i saw this thing blowing up where an animator that worked on this animation for years (before gen AI) is now having said animation accused of being AI. i wish we could go back to assuming things are not AI. it was better for artists that way imo.

like now you have to keep tedious record of your process, or something like that, but even then people don’t believer it’s not AI. it feels like an intentional thing by AI companies or something because it’s all so bizarrely irrational too.

yeah. everyone providing massive dev logs is great for feeding their models. its so ugly. like it would be nice to just choose to believe its all human made art, but that's the exact thing that empowers these scammers. what a disgusting machine to make

I had a few comments where people thought my YouTube voiceover was AI. Painstakingly scripted, recorded, and edited, with years of attention to improving my intonation and enunciation and cadence. But it's only like one in a thousand people. I don't think *most* people think that.

the entire dynamic is insidious. even if you cared enough to do it all by hand, show proof, no amount of proof is enough. ultimately it propagates the idea that cool or different work is not possible without AI, and if something looks unique then it must have involved it. it’s incredibly annoying.