Post

new homepage is nice, but all the icons in the docs sidebar are making my eyes glaze over, esp in the spec section where it's literally the same icon 20 times lol maybe de-emphasize the icons at least? tbh I don't think they're needed at all

we need something for llms to understand at:// better

looks great! congrats on launching it! and especially thanks for keeping the URL paths intact 😁

For more details, check out this post by our very own @alex.bsky.team on the new atproto blog. atproto.com/blog/new-sit...

Is this intended atproto.com/llms.txt ? I was expecting markdown (like www.apptweak.com/llms.txt )

The app and OAuth tutorials are *exactly* what I was looking for this weekend. Thanks for putting those up!

welcome! and honestly we're concerned the OAuth tutorial in particular is longer than it could be right now — if you wind up having suggestions to make it more fun while you're working through it, we'd love to hear them!

Just went through it. Really enjoyed it and was able to get it all working. Only got one or two minor snags (missing call to run migration script, and issues with not having used pnpm before) Is there a way to make a PR or suggest edits?

Nice! @alex.bsky.team I think there needs to be some love put into the framing of AT vs Bluesky still in these, not sure if the content has been improved much compared to the old site but there are a few places where these two things are treated as one and the same

have definitely rewritten loads of those framings in various spots, would love to get feedback on where you think it can be improved further :)

Tbh, I'd prefer if most Bsky stuff was removed from the AT docs. The worse offender I've found so far is the AT Stack doc Both "Feeds" and "Osprey & Ozone" are bsky-specific concepts, not AT.

imo, both of these are (in an interesting way) borderline — I don't see them as inherently bsky specific, and we're doing all we can to further genericize them to make adoption more credible. part of the docs launch involves deliberately pushing the envelope here!

Fair enough include them in the docs somewhere as examples of AT infra, but including them here without distinguishing between AT and Bsky is weird IMO