Post

Welfare asks "do you qualify?" A right asks "are you a member of the community?" Basic income is more than money. It's a claim, a right to access, our shared share of what we all inherit and build together.

15 reposts69 likes

But, if you allocate £700 per person including to all those who are extremely wealthy, you are not doing what you say you are! You're merely funding the extremely wealthy who are *already* deliberately impoverishing the population...

We get it, but hear us out. To exclude the wealthy, you'd have to means-test everyone, verify income, track eligibility, build in cliffs. Since the wealthy are a small slice of the population, their share barely moves total cost. The bureaucracy costs more than it saves. Worth it?

Fair, naming today's billionaires isn't hard. But they're not the only wealthy people worth excluding by that logic. Where's the real cutoff, millionaires too? Top 10%? Top 1%? Every line excludes someone just below it who still needed help, and someone has to defend that number for everyone.

And cliffs are real: means-testing means someone draws an income line. Earn a dollar over it, lose the whole benefit. That punishes people for working more, and someone still has to decide where that line sits, who's "deserving" enough. 'Universal' avoids drawing that line at all.

Basically, basic income starts to fall apart without universality, that's what keeps it simple, dignity-preserving, and administratively cheap. Curious how we define it? Try our interactive definition page: basicincomeaction.org/about?tab=de...

basicincomeaction.orgWhat Defines a Basic Income? | Basic Income ActionAn interactive guide to the seven tenets of basic income — toggle them and enter your own numbers to see how a proposal is classified.