Post

squickygamer.bsky.social
@squickygamer.bsky.social

Okay. I took a moment to think about this but, seriously, this is kind of demeaning to people no, it isn't kind of it IS demeaning to people. Has anyone thought that doing such a thing is just wrong. So for everyone who thinks it's a fun this is funny or or enjoy this. Stop using your smartphones.

Boxo McFoxo
@boxobark.ing

Yes, it is demeaning. It's an insult. Some things should be insulted. It's an insult about a behaviour that is not tied to an immutable characteristic, so it's not demeaning the person, it's demeaning their choices. It's also not even absolutist in its definition!

squickygamer.bsky.social
@squickygamer.bsky.social

So their choice to use a tool designed to help is worthy of being called a demeaning name. I don't have any words for that and I'm saddened you feel that way. Hope you have a nice day. This was written with the assistance of a voice to text, thank you.

Boxo McFoxo
@boxobark.ing

Nobody is calling voice transcription slop. The problem here is a chatbot that's been dishonestly trained to appear as if it's something that's safe to cognitively offload onto. LLMs are only safe for expert use (and by experts I don't mean 'prompt engineers').

0 reposts8 likes

Boxo McFoxo
@boxobark.ing

AI hype has been harmful to assistive technology, not helpful. Disabled people are being told, over their objections, that the tools they rely on have been made obsolete by AI. Vibe coding tools will output HTML that technically meets the ARIA checklist but is functionally not navigable.