Post

Obviously recommendation 4 (that papers must be submitted to arXiv) caught my eye. Two concerns: (a) arXiv moderators sometimes reject a submission and ask authors to go through peer review before reconsideration. This is usually done for major problems or poor writing. But it could place authors

in a Catch-22. In effect, they won't be able to submit to any other conference that also requires ArXiv submission. (b) arXiv will need more moderators in TCS-related categories to handle the increased load. (We need more in math.CO right now, as it is receiving 100s of AI-assisted submissions.)

For the first point, I assume that every such rule will allow for exceptions in cases like the one you suggest (and arXiv can be replaced by other repositories such as ECCC, etc.). As for the second... Yes. We'll need to step up.

0 reposts4 likes

No replies yet.