Post

@rrwilliams.bsky.social tagging you based on @ccanonne.github.io 's post. My replies above contains suggestions for first steps to coordinate the community efforts on this.

See my post for Ryan's.

Hi Clement - could I get a quick follow and DM when you see this please? Writing about it for New Scientist and would love your thoughts. Thanks

The google docs letter was written by AI. The older placeholder fields made it clear (i only have a copy of them, but pangram also checks the rest as AI generated).

scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=e...

I'm really curious: what's your opinion on this communication / dissemination approach by openAI as opposed to their previous approaches? Can you anticipate any serious problems with this approach? Thanks!

Have you heard the good word of John Mastodon? John Mastodon would have let you edit that post.

If Thetis exists (or existed- depending on your views on gods and goddesses) it seems logical that an Hyperthetis and an Hypothetis exist as well. What's that to do with exponential time, I don't know.

Not directly, afaik. Subexponential algorithms for NP problems, and revisiting a lot of what we have based on the ETH of course (including some stuff affecting standard cryptographic assumptions), but nothing as simple as collapse of standard complexity classes. (At least based on my recollection.)