Post

Using LLMs to write but not wanting to engage with LLM-generated content is wild to me. The hypocrisy. Also, why would I read something you didn't bother to write? The value of writing is more than the output it produces. Writing generates understanding and ideas. Why take shortcuts?

i usually ask llm to *shorten* what i wrote and then sometimes i use the edits. i think it’s a bit different from having it create thoughts but i also feel strange about this continuum!

An LLM shortening what you write is still changing the meaning of the ideas you're trying to convey, even if it appears minimal. LLM-editing influences what you write, thus shaping your future ideas. Writing and editing are not just how we teach and share, but also how we learn.

I've always found your writing insightful: you have a great "voice", and you're easy to tell apart from other "known documentation/tutorial writers". That's amazing, I think you should cherish it. Don't cheapen your work.

LLM-editing is a big red "make this text more average" button. I don't want to read the "average sentence on the internet", I want to read what you write. The process *is* the work. Sorry for the rant, have a great day <3

i don’t think that’s actually always a good model for what it does. i think of it more as an effect pedal in a semantic space. true most outputs are boring just like most things you can do with an effect pedal are boring and overdone. doesn’t mean it’s useless or always averages out. needs taste

i mean i feel like i’m able to judge whether what i want to express is more closely conveyed by variant A or variant B and i do have some experience editing myself too. sometimes it helps to process text through a compressor and see what comes out