Post

i mean you can see the potential for change but you can also see the vast darkness and that you may not see substantive change within your lifetime being able to comprehend even slightly a complexity that you barely have the ability to affect

so much about systems change has to align for things to change on anything other than a decades+ timescale but for crisis events (and even in crisis events it's even odds on two steps forward, three steps back), so much is about luck and yet

I think part of the issue is that you can be a systems thinker-singular and then it feels like You Are The One Who Must Change It because You Can See but then again the whole point of the fellowship was that it was a Team Effort and you know exactly which one's the Boromir you're working with

like has anyone studied exactly how much lines up to produce systemic change because I'm pretty sure if you wrote it all out there *would* be the equivalent of "and then some fucking eagles turned up" only eagles are people doing regular people things but fuck me. eagles.

alternatively, you don't achieve radical change by changing a system, you achieve radical change by replacing a system with a new system

Also one problem with being a systems thinker is that it's likely not your actual job. Like, you may be a systems thinker because that's how you approach change you really care about. In which case you're explicitly not in an empowered position to do anything about what you learned.