Post

You can easily save up to 65% of compute while improving performance on reasoning tasks 🤯 👀 Meet EAGer: We show that monitoring token-level uncertainty lets LLMs allocate compute dynamically - spending MORE on hard problems, LESS on easy ones. 🧵👇

Why? Reasoning LLMs shine with CoTs, but full parallel sampling—generating multiple paths per prompt—is inefficient 😤. It wastes compute on redundant, predictable tokens, esp. for easy prompts. Hard prompts need more exploration but get the same budget. Enter EAGER🧠! 🧵2/

The fun part: EAGer-adapt reallocates saved budget to "saturating" prompts hitting the M cap, no labels needed! – Training & Verification-Free 🚀 Full EAGer uses labels to catch failing prompts, lowering threshold to branch or add sequences. Great for verifiable pipelines! 🧵4/

Results: Across 3B-20B models, EAGer cuts budget by up to 80%, boosts perf 13% w/o labels & 37% w/ labels on AIME. As M scales, EAGer consistently: 🚀 Achieves HIGHER Pass@k, ✂️ Uses FEWER tokens than baseline, 🕺 Shifts the Pareto frontier favorably across all tasks. 🧵5/