Accepting a hypothesis depends on the importance of being mistaken. Pielke advocated for taking the role of saying "How about these other ideas?" instead of taking a position in debate. ref. @thehonestbroker.bsky.social (2007). "The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics" 🧩 🧵
Post
"This work underlines the importance of a-posteriori robustness analyses for climate policy support to face deep uncertainty and show the trade-offs among different objectives." Ferrari et al. (2022)
"We introduce a multi-objective, multi-value #IAM framework to guide just climate policymaking". We address three shortcomings: 1. #comparison: "By making decision-makers’ preferences over objectives explicit, multi-objective approaches facilitate a posteriori navigation of conflicting interests." …
… 2. "Accommodate multiple #values and preferences of different stakeholders." 3. #uncertainties: A "feedback mechanism makes adaptive policies robust against deep uncertainties and allows them to accommodate diverse future states-of-the-world (SOW) and extreme events." @pbiswas.bsky.social (2026)
0 reposts0 likes
" • We explore limitations of modelling science in assessing different justice dimensions • We emphasise various procedural, recognitional, & epistemic justice considerations • We take aim at the disconnect with non-modellers and Global South underrepresentation." @a-nikas.bsky.social et al. (2026)