Post

NEW: If AI erodes paths to growth, like manufacturing and service exports, what can poor countries do? I went through commonly-recommended contenders and came out skeptical that any are a truly comparable growth engine. Is sending people to rich countries the best bet?

0 reposts0 likes

Export-led growth did 3 things: earned hard currency, employed huge numbers of people, and made those workers steadily more productive by doing the work. High revenues alone aren't enough if fewer and fewer people are employed by that industry, as I wrote in my last post.

Data labeling is a common suggestion. It's a job *created by* AI. But this is prone to wage competition; Filipino rates on some projects dropped from $10 a task to <$0.01. And demand is shifting up the skill chain to experts like lawyers, doctors, etc. in high income countries

Another is agriculture - people need food, and AI is not growing it. But demand for food is capped, so when productivity rises, workers leave farming. And the real money is in the branding and marketing; farmers capture about 6.6 cents of every chocolate dollar.

Tourism only works if you have something enticing for visitors. Even then, there's a limitation on demand and how many people you can serve. Of the US sectors tracked since 1990, accommodation and food is nearly the only one where hours grew faster than output/worker.