“Freedom from persistent, dragnet-style surveillance while in public is not a foreign concept in our society, and it is a reasonable expectation that society already accepts,” as reflected in the Supreme Court’s cellphone decisions." More cases incoming. chicago.suntimes.com/columnists/2...
chicago.suntimes.comJudicial tide may be turning against indiscriminate Flock mass surveillanceFederal judge presses the point that police perusal of our traveling histories on demand can be constitutionally problematic.
6 reposts22 likes