Post

NEW: Two weeks ago, SCOTUS made a statement: the bloodshed of the civil rights movement can be discounted because it belongs to another era. Claims that we no longer need these protections ignore an underlying reality: laws like this are dismantled when they become inconvenient to people in power.

democracydocket.comDestroying the Voting Rights Act wasn't just a legal ruling. It was a moral statementThe Court’s action to dismantle Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act wasn’t in isolation. It is part of a broader recalibration of rights in this country.

113 reposts268 likes

I learned in school that drugs were dropped in African Americans' neighborhoods to pollute and hurt their populations.Well, it actually has hurt every race and gender to date. A lesson to be learned, when one thinks it will only hurt the one it will eventually always hurt the many. 'isms' are alive.

Awful, biased SCOTUS rulings: VOTING RIGHTS ACT VOTING MAPS ROE v WADE CITIZENS UNITED RACIAL PROFILING IMMUNITY EDUCATION INJUNCTION EPA CHEVRON >>> GOP Justices are guided by PERSONAL BELIEFS, *not* the law or the people's interest! > CAN'T be overruled > NO binding ethics > LIFETIME app't

Robertson actually said that America has solved the racism problem. Really? Are there 9 Black Justices on the SC? How many Black presidents have we had? The fact that Confederates REFUSE to remove statues of people like Lee proves the racism issue is ongoing. Or rename military bases.