Post

I want to say in the nicest way, “fuck the Supreme Court.”

MsCynt

@stayingwoke.bsky.social

Why is he inserting himself into states rights? They used to call them outside agitators. Voting was ok until he thought his convictions and grifting might keep him from being elected so he started the attacks. The Heritage Foundation that produced Project 2025 researched and less than 1% for years.

mjayne01.bsky.social

@mjayne01.bsky.social

Tennessee, Alabama, & Louisiana have already done it. Having all the branches of the US government run by 1 party has intensified their quest to retain those powers at any cost.

DWBlack14 Geo/Engr.

@dwblack14.bsky.social

We must continue to fight the DOJ’s attempts to disenfranchise voters rights. Let the marches and protest movements across the US send a clear message to #DonaldTrump We will fight this issue for as long as it takes to protect the rights of every voter across America.

pamballard3.bsky.social

@pamballard3.bsky.social

Why vote for a party that makes it harder for you to vote. If they don't want your vote, because you are not white, or their kind of person, vote blue for the party, that is what America looks like, I am voting blue.

pamballard3.bsky.social

@pamballard3.bsky.social

They might, but we can all fight back, register, check your registration weekly, make a copy of your registration. Plan your vote, know where your polling place is, keep checking with your election office, GOP like to change at last minute. Vote early, in person, by mail, drop box, VOTE BLUE!!!!

PJAIR

@pjair.bsky.social

Let them try! 🇺🇸 it will be ass kicking time! Ya an’t seen nothing yet! The Republican Party will go up in flames 🔥 if they try to spot our votes!

democracydocket.comThe 1993 “Motor Voter” Law Helping You Register to VoteRead the latest Explainer.

(2/8) BACKGROUND: A safeguard known as the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) bars states from carrying out systematic voter removals within 90 days of a federal election. This “quiet period” is meant to prevent eligible voters from being wrongly kicked off the rolls too close to Election Day.

(3/8) WHAT’S HAPPENING NOW? In a new filing, the DOJ argues that the quiet period only protects against systematic voter purges. It does not block states from removing voters on an individualized basis if they’ve been flagged as ineligible by the federal government.

democracydocket.comTrump DOJ doubles down on claim that states can purge voters right before electionsIn other words: DOJ is claiming that the federal government or private groups could conduct the systematic review, identify voters they believe may be ineligible and pass those names on to Georgia,…

(4/8) Voting rights advocates are concerned that the DOJ’s theory could let federal officials and anti-voting groups do the list-building work first, then pressure states to carry out the removals individually. The Supreme Court could take up the issue next term.

democracydocket.com🚨 Mi Familia Vota v. FontesLearn more.

(5/8) SCOTUS could also take on another lawsuit where Republicans are attempting to litigate a loophole into the law by interpreting the NVRA’s quiet period as allowing noncitizens to be systematically removed during those 90 days.

chemister.bsky.social

@chemister.bsky.social