Post

I asked former fed'l judge John Jones where he'd put the mail voting case at SCOTUS on a 1-10 scale of importance: "Ultimately, the decision in this case is at least a 9, if not a 10," he said. "It has the potential, if decided in a certain way...." 1/2 theconversation.com/supreme-cour...

theconversation.comSupreme Court to decide on whether Trump’s voting-by-mail rules can go into effect – but might not rule yet on whether they’re constitutionalHow will the Supreme Court justices approach the vote-by-mail case that concerns the most fundamental right in a democracy, the right to vote? A former federal judge weighs in on their task.

0 reposts0 likes

"..., to interfere with the franchise of voting in a way that the federal government has never attempted to do, and certainly the president has never attempted to do before.It literally could disenfranchise thousands and thousands of voters...I can’t think of any historical analog to this case" 2/2