Post

Accounts (particularly huge ones like media orgs) should be able to set a "default feed" where, when you visit their profile, instead of seeing the reverse chron, gives you a feed they've created for their audience. This is a killer differentiator and @bsky.app needs to have built it a year ago.

Andrew Lisowski πŸ’»@hipstersmoothie.com

1. Make Discover like For You 2. Improve feed UX (Both using and sharing) 3. Add more opportunities to discover feeds (anywhere from the new Discover feed showing you where it got a post or actual new items in feed generators that allow for cross promotion)

If I go to your homepage there's a long list of feeds. Are you saying that you want to pin one of them to the homepage? A media org can already create a set of feeds that are 1 click from the homepage, you want to pick one as the hero feed?

Not quite. The flow would be: You're the NYTimes - you have a diverse audience that comes to you for many reasons. Today, on Bluesky, when you, the dedicated reader, visit their profile page, you are presented with the "posts" tab - for large orgs particularly, this is all algorithmically determined

Products like Hootsuite "read the room" and determine the "optimal time" to post (or indeed create a new post of the same content) from the account. When you look at a profile page for a large media org, the result is pretty thematically disjointed. Additionally, orgs have no way to know who's there

Visiting/reading/engaging with them on their profile - it's just this vast dead space of traffic no team in social has really engaged with, ever. What I propose is an optional "default feed" - where an account can specify a feed of their own design to stand as the default lander on their profile.

This would be the first tab on a profile, to the left of "posts", where the feed is a controllable artifact - the NYTimes gets to decide whats trending, how to personalize the experience, how/if to remind you to subscribe, etc. This would be unique to Bluesky and a pain to replicate elsewhere.

To think of it differently - NYTimes runs a website - they control the order and nature of content there, perhaps with personalization, in order to entice the reader towards actions and further their business goals. This would extend the same mental model to social. This would be unique to BSky

0 reposts1 like

News orgs are already over legacy social. The center of mass in that industry is already here. Network effects work in reverse too - if we can unwind the core informational value ("news right now") of X by providing features that directly benefit business goals of news media we have a shot here imo.