Post

And for Nanaimo folks, we've got you covered! We put a set of community-sourced questions to all the municipal candidates, covering a range of issues that are important to us: harm reduction, voluntary treatment for substance use disorders, and bylaw enforcement. #bcpoli #Nanaimo #harmreduction

JACKIE BOLEN — |A| Supports a Housing First, non-enforcement approach to homelessness and the toxic drug crisis. Our take: Recognizes that the City can remove municipal barriers to life-saving harm reduction services.

STEVEN JOHNS — |F| Emphasizes CSOs, prohibition, and abstinence-based approaches to the toxic drug crisis. Our take: Steven is asking prohibition and abstinence to do a lot of heavy lifting when our governments have already been failing miserably with that approach for hundreds of years.

SHANE CRAWLEY — |C| Focuses on providing campsites for people experiencing homelessness. Our take: Recognizing the need for shelter is a start—but we need leaders who will at least dream as big as four walls and a roof for their voters.

PAUL CHAPMAN — |A| Supports harm reduction, supportive housing, and community-based approaches. He is a YIMBY and lives alongside these services himself. Our take: “Out of sight, out of mind is not sound policy.” We agree, Paul.

PAUL VAN RYSSEL — |C| Provides broad responses with few clear or actionable municipal commitments. Our take: It was challenging to determine how much he understands or cares about these issues based on his responses.

Watkins: Our take: Displays a strong understanding that increased police budgets are not contributing to safer communities, decreased rates of public drug use or homelessness.

0 reposts0 likes

JANICE PERRINO — |F| Uses stigmatizing language (refers to voters as “addicts” and “drug addicted”) and carries a heavy tone of pro-carceral approaches to homelessness and deaths from drug poisonings.

SARAH LOVEGROVE — |A| (Mayoral Candidate) Proposes a human-rights-based, evidence-informed approach focused on dignity, upstream solutions, and measurable outcomes.

Lovegrove: Our take: “If enforcement was an effective means to address these issues, we would be seeing positive change …” We agree, Sarah. It’s time for change!