Post

AA's numbers are generally pretty well matched to the relative vibes, except that they really overrate frontier midrange models (Terra, Sonnet) They do not include tests for long-haul directional adherence, though, which is a major gap You will not notice in practice a 5-point swing between models

Techmeme@techmeme.com

Z.ai's GLM-5.3 with max reasoning scores 60 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, on par with Kimi K3 but below Opus 5 at 63 and Fable 5 at 62 (@artificialanlys) Main Link | Techmeme Permalink

I think GLM-5.3 is fine. I also think it might be overcooked. It talks like Opus 5 and that is a bad thing. I also have had more off-task sessions with it as my top orchestrator than 5.2. My working assumption is that as a reviewer and a planning oracle it is very substitutable for Sol.

0 reposts7 likes

No replies yet.