Post

My take on the Claude Mythos claims (reportedly very good at offensive cybersecurity) - I think the claims are legit - the industry catch up to fix and raise to the level will be somewhat painful

- mythos will be expensive. I think 10x Opus 4.6. So above script kiddy but affordable for a big enough org - it is conveniently good marketing for Anthropic IPO (see later point)

- Anthropic happened to have reached this level and they had to announce it now to reap the benefit of « thousands of vulnerabilities found », the next contender will get what remains (low)

- I think this means that software will be more expensive, not less and that an software editor brings value (sharing the cost around « coding ». I base that on the security aspect and others I am seeing

- mythos project evaluation runs are reportedly in the order of 10k for analysys and build of the main exploit, so you can’t run in each PR shift left style :) - AI is becoming more expensive as it gets more useful.

0 reposts0 likes

Also reading between the lines, cybersecurity is just the domain that anthropic decided to apply mythos on. Other domains will follow and thinking about price per value will be more important than ever

The cost (and maybe some regulations) can also have interesting geopolitical consequences: a nation-state with deep pockets will be able to find zero-days on a number of software whose owner can't afford it and add them to its private collection.

That’s the intermediary state yes. I was assuming they could already by hand but expensive. It will just be cheaper for state actors. And affordable for big orgs. But soon the discovery bar will be high again when vendors check their software against Mythos before release.