Post

The suggested offences also place an onus on the victims, or targeted victims, to prove severe harm or distress which has a serious adverse effect This is both potentially difficult to prove and makes *attempted* conversion practices and offering such abusive practice almost impossible to persecute

2 reposts17 likes

The carve out for "healthcare" fails our "no exemptions or exceptions" criteria because it leaves an enormous loophole for any conversion practices provider to claim they are practicing healthcare. This would make the ban potentially completely useless. bsky.app/profile/joly...

This post is unavailable.

This bill, in its current form, simply is not fit for practice. It is, as far as we can see, so short because it has been rushed out for political reasons and leaves an enormous loophole any conversion practices provider could use. We hope to see a Scottish bill in the upcoming ScotGov PfG.

The draft bill also includes the discredited concept of these practices involving "causing to have a trans identity" - and similar for non-heterosexual orientations. There are no such conversion practices. Conversion practices are anti-LGBTQ+ abuse. The idea of pro-LGBTQ+ conversion is a myth.

This myth creates the potential for anti-trans campaigners to launch legal attacks on providers of trans healthcare and support services using the discredited myth of "transing the gay away". A bill to ban conversion practices should cede no ground to such legal assaults on support for trans people