Post

oh how nice since Jeff Bezos blue origin is ground for his exploding launch 😂 Billionaires need better hobbies and stop fucking with Aerospace

Alexandru Gheorghe

@agheorghe.bsky.social

Yet no reusability.

And some more network junk in the sky !!

Alexandru Gheorghe

@agheorghe.bsky.social

Actually, I don't have anything against that. Just that there's no reusability to cut down costs.

Akira

@akira9b.bsky.social

@scottkimmel53.bsky.social

I was actually referring to the payload, not the rocket ...

Odiseus_31

17 June

But it doesn't explode.

Alexandru Gheorghe

@agheorghe.bsky.social

@scottkimmel53.bsky.social

SpaceX rockets (Falcon9) rarely explodes and first stage recovery is almost always guaranteed.

Odiseus_31

Yes with a fraction of power that has Ariane 6. Starship is a total mess.

youtu.beThe Fed just flipped everythingYouTube video by Chris Norlund

The US economy has not bottomed yet? Unemployment rate is the last metrics to react to the fundamental changes. #Trump #Iran youtu.be/uUXTAVrLpkY

spaceodysseyhub.comAriane 6 vs Falcon 9: Europe's Flagship vs SpaceX's Workhorse — A Complete ComparisonAriane 6 vs Falcon 9 compared: specs, cost, reusability, and why Europe builds its own rocket even though SpaceX launches for half the price.

Arianne 6 may not have the volume, but it is mostly on par or exceeding SpaceX's current capability. More payload on the same price except on Falcon 9 LEO orbits on reused stages. SpaceX can dilute some true expenses with book keepimg practices, though. spaceodysseyhub.com/articles/ari...

*) I.e. SpaceX has *only* cost per kg benefit with Falcon 9 reused stages with payload to LEO. Which it uses mainly for their own purposes. Even with massive federal and state subsidies and volume benefit SpaceX has, Arianne 6 is not that far off with their offering. $2.5 trillion my ass.