Post
igi, because often there is an underlying user-ask. google spying lubricates all sorts of "the computer should just know" features that people like-to-claim-to-hate-while-using-them but i think more clearly "no one asked" papers over thinking about why a PM thought this was smart
0 reposts7 likes
yes! very true! and fully orthogonal to 'no one asked'. like i'm not saying these things are good, i'm saying this idea corrupts our ability to discuss why they're bad
yes! that one is worse because it's occasionally attached to an idea with legs and it's like "please don't, i was listening up to that point"
if you mentally delete "no one asked for this" from one's polemic toolbox and replace it with "why would this ever happen" the latter basically always has an answer that if internalized makes your protest more effective. "why did google spy on us?" - to make ads """better""". that leads to more whys
'no one asked' is also subtly shibboleth-shaped in that it communicates "i am not going to consider entire categories of whys"; if you were you'd get to the person who asked. so when i read it, i know not to bother with certain expectations to think things through, which is probably also suboptimal!