Post

For those going “New Jersey?!” Yes. Slavery happened in the north too. Most passed gradual emancipation laws post-Revolution. NJ’s was so gradual there were still enslaved people in 1865. Lincoln’s proclamation only applied to the South. The last people to be freed were in NJ, Delaware + Kentucky.

As @erindwyer.bsky.social mentions below, these laws were gradual with the enslaver in mind, to blunt the economic impact of freedom. New York had the most slavery in the North, and it didn’t fully end until 1827! However most enslaved people had self-emancipated and moved to the city by then.

46 reposts286 likes

Yup. The truth is closer to “it was worst in the South.” IMO the minimization of northern slavery, northern segregation, implicit “polite” racism etc, holds us all back from real multiracial democracy. It’s like saying second-degree murder is fine because first-degree murder exists!

It’s a misconception I shared until reading a bit more history. You think anti-slavery means anti-racism, and it just doesn’t. Slavery was just so obviously reprehensible, even gutter racists felt queasy about it. Lincoln himself was a white supremacist.

It's similar to slavery here in Canada. It was worse in the southern US and that history largely overshadows the truth closer to home. Slavery was not abolished in Canada until it was slowly abolished across the British Empire between 1807 and 1834. humanrights.ca/story/story-...

humanrights.caThe story of Black slavery in Canadian history | CMHRCanada celebrates being a destination for Americans who escaped slavery via the Underground Railroad. But slavery was also part of Canada’s history for more than 200 years.

There is nothing in our country, no place, no tradition, no business that is not tainted by slavery. It skewed the finances and social status of everyone who lived here then, their families and most who came after. We are all still wearing it. And I'm not sure it can ever go away.