Post

This post was a disappointing read. I get that AI has a very negative connotation online, thanks to OpenAI, Nvidia and the like using it liberally for their marketing, but using that as an argument to make people out as anti-technology is really not the best play. Should've kept this in the drafts.

-surrounding the companies behind them and that whole rabbit hole. It's disingenuous to equate that with all the other technologies that fall under the AI category for the sake of your argument. Context is very important. LLMs being useful for accessibility and security MAY be true, but still not-

-the rock solid argument you think it is. People in the comments of the quoted post already have made their arguments regarding accessibility, so I'll let them speak for themselves, but the security aspect can only work if people trust the dev(s) with their project, which isn't always guaranteed.

How can you expect people to trust something that is touched by LLMs when LLMs can't even do the two major things that a toddler can do, learning and prioritizing? (youtu.be/5dfFAlpkYhs) That, coupled with the (to put it mildly) dubious nature of the training data for the majority of them, makes-