Post

A question unanswered by this article: What happens when Nydia Velázquez, who legally is chair, calls a meeting and holds a board election? And what happens when the chair elected at that meeting tells Bichotte to hand over the BKDems social media passwords and bank account login info?

Then Bichotte Hermelyn will do what Adams did. A bunch of transactions to cover tracks and then say they forgot the password and walk away from the issue like losers.

That’s not how bank records or passwords to bank accounts work.

I think, in order, it goes like this: -if she is legally chair, then all those actions are binding, and accordingly, -if the [...rump Dems? Pretender Dems? What kind of old-timey English term for pretender-to-the-throne do we wanna bring back here?] refuse, then it's probably Contempt O'Clock

To be clear, that's more contempt of court charges on TOP of the minefield they already ran full-tilt into here, possibly even from entirely different litigation/judges, and at a point judges who might've previously levied fines start thinking it's gonna take jail time to get the message across