Post

To the extent that you can trust the “expertise” of the many in my field who say it is useful (enough so to brush aside, unmentioned, the myriad negative externalities), bear in mind that this field was very uniquely positioned for its most craven practitioners enjoy critical mass adoption.

Tom Scocca@tomscocca.bsky.social

It's OK at doing code for you? Great. What does that have to do with how it keeps popping up to demand to rewrite a paragraph that's already written and edited?

Many of us still stridently oppose integration of LLMs into our work. It is of course hard to hear us over those who have taken their bosses’ point of view as their own.

There is no shortage of people whose job is literally to write ad tech spyware bloat week in and week out who are perfectly willing to tell you with a straight face that it is unthinkable for them not to use this tool to close tickets 20% faster.

It has been fascinating, btw, to hear so many such certain, objective claims about their productivity with these products, in an industry vexed since its very beginnings by the question of how to actually measure its productivity. To the extent that expertise is framed by rigor, there is none here.

1 repost8 likes

No replies yet.