Post

I look at this differently. People aren't the threat. Our collective lack of preparedness and lack of shared experience in managing the shift in workflow/workload that agents cause is the threat.

James@43081j.com

Good stuff being said by @nicr.dev 🙏

0 reposts8 likes

That picture is obviously a slide without context, but in that talk I explicitly mentioned that I myself am a user of LLM tools, ans that they do help me with maintainance.

The main threat is people being completely irresponsible and just spamming maintianers leading them to burnout, which now requires very low effort to do thanks to the LLMs they have access to. And that's not even their goal! They just don't want to spend any effort into educating themselves.

And the problem is specifically people, not tools. The tools by themselves sit there doing nothing, somebody must use them to do harm.

That I agree with 100% but I'd still caution against the framing that the person is a threat as a general statement. It's the kind of sound bite comment that's way too easy to mis-characterize.

The framing here is important. Saying that the threat is "People with LLMs" are the threat makes it too easy to move into Us vs Them territory, assigning blame where it doesn't belong, and forces conclusions that aren't defensible...

... Open source communities have been built on the assumption that contribution is personal and difficult. That there's a high bar that limits volume. We don't have the tools in place for anything other than that...

... The problem is not the person using the tool... The problem is that none of us know how the roll The problem is that none of us know how the tool should be used or whether it should be used at all...

... Are some people using it wrong? Yes, absolutely. Is it their fault? Not really. Are AI companies that are pushing everything on the ecosystem being unethical? Absolutely! But let's be careful about assigning blame when no one yet has the right answer.