Post

Really rare to spot something like this in the wild, but The Wall Street Journal ran a "Supreme Court Expansion Is Secretly Unconstitutional Actually" column that directly refutes its thesis in the paragraph that immediately follows. Beautiful stuff. www.wsj.com/opinion/is-c...

Is expanding the Supreme Court unconstitutional? Probably. [starts new paragraph] The Constitution says nothing about the size of the Supreme Court, [the Manhattan Institute immediately offers me a salary of $1 million per year]

He even admits it includes “the number of justices”

It’s SUCH a funny thing for him to go out of his way to specify

Folks, this blog is more challenging to write than I would like because there are only so many ways I can write “that’s now how this works, that’s not how any of this works” like the old esurance commercial. I’m still gonna do the blog, because I am a man of my word. I’m just saying.