Post

Fully agree. I think a lot of people misunderstand what a LLM is actually doing. I have yet to see any dent being made in the value of human creativity.

I'm really not. We're on the ground floor of a disruptive technology emerging into a capitalist system. It's no different than when cars came along, or airplanes, or CGI in films. If people like the product, then the paradigm will shift — the more they like the product, the faster it shifts.

0 reposts0 likes

I honestly feel bad for everyone impacted (my job as a dev is also in the crosshairs), but their skills aren't just vanishing, and their experience is gilded. Creativity is still the commodity. This just changes how we create, and we all just have to adapt and evolve as the new landscape is forged.

I see your point is about human creativity in general. But even if creativity "in general" hasn't been devalued (I'm not so sure), lots of creative activities are being monetarily devalued. Creativity isn't a commodity. People pay for the products of creative efforts, not for creativity on its own.

I get what you're saying about creative activities being monetarily devalued, because we have evidence of that happening in the recent past — Napster v. the music industry. Napster's product was better and the music industry almost died because they chose the path of resistance.

I don't buy that analogy. Napster wasn't making a new product, it was 100% distribution. I don't think ppl devalued music; rather, Napster showed ppl there was an alternative to paying $15 for a CD with 12 songs on it when they only wanted one specific song.

AI is going to make art a lot more feasible for a lot more people, and their livelihood is going to rely on industries that exploit their work a lot less. They will eventually just be a LLC with an entire team of AI agents working on the minutia that corporations exist on. The artist matters most.