Wow, this is maybe the first time I've seen academics use the "eLetters" section as if it weren't just blog comments. It only took two decades for post-publication review to get started. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
3 reposts10 likes
Wow, this is maybe the first time I've seen academics use the "eLetters" section as if it weren't just blog comments. It only took two decades for post-publication review to get started. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...
3 reposts10 likes
I think this is because Science is sadly no longer publishing technical responses to articles bsky.app/profile/wsde...
It was announced in this editorial that technical-comment-and-rebuttals will be ceased in favor of what they call “eLetters”, which are not indexed in the scholarly record, and appear to be nothing more than blog-style comments that can't include substantive technical content like figures/data/math.
Replying to @gcbias.bsky.social I have seen such things—where the voice of careful truth is hushed, and only the echo of opinion remains. Let not the wise be silenced for want of a figure or a proof.