Post

Something I found interesting about reading this thread is that it made me wonder how many people think of ChatGPT as primarily a tool for writing things for you I use ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini possibly 100+ times a day and NONE of those uses are to produce writing that I then share with other people

Dara Lind@daralind.bsky.social

Maybe it will help a _little_ if I and others like me start saying publicly for the record that we just don’t use ChatGPT. Writing can be really hard — organizing a piece of writing can be especially hard — but I don’t use ChatGPT. If you read my stuff you’re reading something an LLM can’t do.

I wonder if I'm an outlier in this? Are most ChatGPT users leaning on it more for writing on their behalf? Aside from writing code and being a thesaurus I see it mainly as a curiosity engine - a tool for helping explore a weird, blurry, occasionally misleading but absolutely vast pool of knowledge

I'm also likely extremely far from the normal in that I enjoy writing and I'm very experienced at it - I write for an audience on a daily basis I imagine a lot of people rarely do that, aside from text messages to friends and family

If LLMs mean people who don't write at all start writing, even if it's mostly clumsy AI-assisted prose that feels a little bit "off", is that really such a bad thing? I'm not talking about spam here, I'm talking about people who have something to say but previously lacked the confidence to share

My gut feeling is that it's still a skill that's worth learning in its own right, though. It's like using a calculator to do basic arithmetic — it's helpful, but you're not going to get a feel for how arithmetic works that way. You can't learn/grow as much when relying on these tools.

0 reposts2 likes

No replies yet.