Post

It is quite strange how little the actual public inquiry we're having into the UK's Covid response - the one that's publishing in-depth reports every few months - factors into the "you're not even allowed to ask these questions" complaints. We are, in fact, officially asking these questions!

I don't think that's entirely fair. I agree they kinda mangled the explanation of that figure but I don't think it's anywhere near as erroneous as you suggest; it's explicitly a counterfactual and as such it's a bit off to go "oh but it can't include this bit of counterfactuality as well"

Agree there’s nothing wrong with stating counterfactuals given arbitrarily fixed antecedent params. However, they’re only policy-relevant if those params are realistic. And i.a. the chair and secretary have neither much scientific background nor any apparent inclination to acquire it.