Post

ST commissioned the study from Cambridge Systematics, weighing the cost of gating each station against the new fare revenue gates would capture. The headline: whether gates pay off hinges almost entirely on how many riders are skipping fares today. 2/6 🧵

0 reposts3 likes

The whoa, way big-deal case: if ~45% of Link riders are skipping fares, gating all Link stations could net up to ~$750M over 20 years. That's real money. But that 45% evasion number comes from the peak of the pandemic, when compliance cratered. 3/6 🧵

The who care, barely-worth-it case: if evasion is actually ~15% (85% paying), the math flips. Gating every Link station takes ~18 years just to break even, and gating the whole system stops penciling out at all. Same gates, opposite verdict. 4/6 🧵

So where are we really? ST board data puts broad fare payment around 63% (up from 56% in 2022), while ~85% of riders who actually get checked have valid fare. Neither's a clean evasion number, but both point well below the pandemic-peak 45%. Source: seattletransitblog.com/2026/05/21/t... 5/6 🧵

seattletransitblog.comThe Status of Fare Evasion in Washington StateSince Metro resumed fare enforcement in 2025, buses have displayed “Fares Required” as part of the headsign rotation. (Michael Smith) During the pandemic, fares were suspended on a numb…

Bottom line: gates are probably worth doing, especially at the busiest stations, and could recapture real revenue ($700M is real $). But do they build Ballard or close ST3's multi-billion capital gap? No, that's a separate problem. 'They don't matter' and 'just install them' are both wrong. 6/6 🧵