people are always saying anti-AI arguments don’t understand the full nuances of the technology. which is correct. but only because it stole everyone’s work, exists solely to get you fired, has made the entire internet unusable and has been forced on everyone without consent
The thing is there isn't much nuance to the technology. Every possible application would be better served by a specifically designed tool made by those who will be using (like everything else!) but these techghouls want an omnitool. They want the all-purpose hammer.
I’m being genuine here, sorry not trying to annoy! It’s just all the tools I use daily to build things now are only possible (I think?) with tech like an LLM and I get huge value from them.
I read your original message as every application of AI would be better served by some other tool, so was saying an application that can’t is coding agents.
AI makes that so much faster and higher quality that it’s super valuable, and no other tech is able to make it possible I don’t think?