Post

For a neural circuit to be "specialized", does it need specialized neurons? In our new work - now out in @NatureNeuro - we address this question in the BLA, using representational geometry to propose a new population-centric way of defining circuit specialization. 🧵👇 1/

2/ The BLA is known to have specialized circuits for valence (+/-), but what about other features of emotional experiences, such as behavior? In a virtual burrow assay, we observed that mice both tremble (~freeze) and ingress (~flee) in response to aversive (shock-paired) odors.

3/ Both trembling and freezing are more frequent in response to aversive odors (CS+), but far from exclusive. Mice typically tremble and then ingress when CS+ is presented, in accordance with the predator-imminence theory (freeze -> flee).

1 repost3 likes

4/ What about the neural code? All variables were highly decodable, but representing the world is not enough to act on it. What matters is "how" this information is organized!

5/ For example, to make quick, precise decisions when faced with threats, the brain needs to read out information precisely (low interference) and flexibly (high generalization) - this is a "specialized" circuit. How can we design one?

6/ A circuit made of specialized sub-populations, such as "valence neurons" and "tremble neurons", clearly satisfies these requirements: sub-populations encode variables independently, and each trivially generalizes across contexts because it cares about only one thing.

7/ But we can also characterize these properties (high generalization, low interference) on a population level. For generalization, we can use cross-condition generalization performance (CCGP). For interference, we developed a new measure: cross-variable interference (CVI):