Post

Is *anyone* using "Require branches to be up to date before merging" ? Always saw this setting as pretty harmful (N people update their branch in the hope to merge, only one can, all others wasted their CI time; rinse and repeat).

I don't understand why GH doesn't provide "max age" / "max depth" / "checkpoint commit" mechanisms to make this more acceptable to high-velocity repositories.

0 reposts3 likes

No replies yet.