Post

I am constantly amazed at how many people have totally internalized the blatantly false belief that Section 230 was premised on platforms being "neutral" when the ENTIRE point of it was the opposite, that they shouldn't have to be.

Ari Cohn@aricohn.com

Section 230 was based on the exact opposite understanding: that online services are not, and should not be forced to be "neutral channels"

Our enemies want us dead

@somuchderp.bsky.social

29 Mar

That's crazy. You're basically saying that the entire Internet should be censored by Internet service providers. Whatever happened to the campaign for Net Neutrality?

Mike Masnick

@masnick.com

Net neutrality was *only* ever about internet *access* providers.

29/3/26, 2:51 pm1 repost13 likes

Vincent Janelle

@randomfrequency.bsky.social

30 Mar

And harkened back to common carriers?