Post
3) This new questionnaire is meant to replace the DSQ-PEM. It's a short 10-item tool to quickly assess PEM and see if people meet ME/CFS case definitions. You can check out the questionnaire here: www.explorationpub.c...
6) The questionnaire also asks about how effective pacing is. The most common replies were 'Moderately effective' (37%) and 'Mildly effective' 34%. For 13% of participants, it was not effective at all.
0 reposts10 likes
9) As someone noted, this is "almost a perfect list of things I want people to understand are not PEM." There are also issues with the scoring algorithm, as it gives a higher score to more triggers, longer PEM duration, and less effectiveness of pacing.
10) Here's the link to the paper: Jason et al. 2025. A brief, comprehensive measure of post-exertional malaise. www.explorationpub.c... The previous DSQ-PEM can be found here: www.leonardjason.com... The long DPEMQ is available here: journals.sagepub.com...