Post

That’s bc he was a hack piece of shit. Like I can see the argument for when people talk about Warhol and his “recontextualizing” of existing things, like soup cans or Elvis, but Lichtenstein was a thief. He wasn’t “recontextualizing” shit. He took an existing drawing and made it big. Hack. Shit.

Ste Jormur@stejormur.bsky.social

I'd never seen this Roy Lichtenstein painting before, but it's incredible how he manages unfailingly to make his copies worse than the original comics he's ripping off.

Warhol, at least, changed the media of the items he presented. He drew, then screenprinted his soup cans, for instance. Lichtenstein took a drawing and just made a bigger (& worse executed) version. He’s a hack and his “work” should be considered a cautionary tale, but the world of “fine art” is

1 repost13 likes

Full of people high on their own flatulence & they’ll never admit that they’ve been bamboozled so this shit gets to make millions while the guys he stole from died in poverty. In case you didn’t know, I have *feelings* about Lichtenstein…