Post

So we are "fighting fraud" by establishing a NEW slush fund where Trump personally decides payouts? What a grift. Trump is serious about fraud—serious about committing it!

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com

Trump: "Sometimes there's a dispute about who turned them in and who is supposed to get what and when. So I am going to do something which I think people will like - I will be the arbitrator of all of these decisions. I'll determine whether the person is deserving ... there's nothing in this for me"

289 reposts1.1K likes

Correct, he needs a method to give his criminal cohorts money, and he of course thinks he can give them tax (our!) money. HE would never give them his own. Guarantee it's a replacement for the previous slush fund.

Talk to Johnson - impeachment actions have to start in the House, and he won't let any of them reach the floor (when his hand was forced on Hegseth, he put the House on vacation for probably the rest of the year). Amendment 25 starts with the VP, who approves of his boss. Senate can't start shit.

A tip for the new hotline: Trump sued his own government for $10 billion, and lawyers he appointed settled with a $1.776 billion fund and a bar on IRS claims against him. A judge found it collusive and the fund was scrapped. grandtheftamerica.us/money/trump-...

grandtheftamerica.usTrump settles $10B IRS suit, $1.776B fundLawyers he appointed settled with him and barred IRS tax claims against him. A judge found it collusive, and the fund was scrapped.

“.. the document .. cements the power of a small group of people handpicked by the Trump administration to govern and profit from the deal. The role of the Venezuelan government and the potential benefits to its people are largely absent ..” @propublica.org www.propublica.org/article/trum...

propublica.orgThe Secret Terms of Trump’s Venezuelan Oil DealThe Trump administration committed the U.S. to taking a large stake in a Venezuelan company, some of whose owners and investors are shielded from public view. The exact details of the agreement over o...

Jesus wept. This a**hole the arbiter? Just another grift, especially since they've never kept their word on any payments (except the measly $90 to Medicare recipients that is our money anyway). He has got to go.

Whenever he says “there is nothing in it for me”, what he means is, “it’s all for me.” I hope the Congress can convince a few Republicans to truly impeach him. He commits treason, bribery, and other high crimes and misdemeanors every day.

Sooo, the rule of law and the Constitution are merely suggestions now. There are no longer 3 co-equal branches of government. Do I have that right?

JFC! Another way to pilfer money out of the treasury, AND going after his perceived enemies. It's a two-fer! Get this fucker and his Russian plants out of the WH right fuckin' now!

Yes , and he has already given one of his minions who instigated Metro surge in Minnesota $10K … It’s another disgusting corrupt slush fund … being distributed by the King

Which is why he must be held accountable. If we let this stand and shy away from impeaching, removing, arresting, and prosecuting this corrupt treasonous despicable abomination of a president, the United States will never recover.

What's the governor's plan for countering election interference from trump. Does he have any? Have you been pushing him to plan and announce those plans so we have some reason to think the person in charge is prepared?

Yes, we see the corruption and treason happening every day. What are you preparing to do about it if Democrats retake the House and Senate? Are you able to get any of the MAGA crowd in Congress on board to stop this?

“There’s nothing in it for me” except bribes and/or kickbacks and/or favors corrupt MFer anytime Trump opens his mouth to do anything other than breathe or eat he’s lying

That 🍊🤡 JUST SAID last week that he thinks leakers should be SHOT. Does anyone not realize this is a honeypot trap for them to compile their revenge list????? Or else find some new blackmail prospects??? Sheesh.

What's wrong with courts, which might even try to establish whether fraud had been committed based on evidence? Oh! Wait! That question answers itself.