Post

After nearly 3.5 years of deliberations, researchers concluded their independent assessment of the origin of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 go.nature.com/4rEfsCJ

go.nature.comCOVID’s origins: what we do and don’t knowResearchers summarize key insights from the world’s first comprehensive investigation into how a pandemic started.

28/2/26, 8:59 am23 reposts50 likes

quisp65.bsky.social

@quisp65.bsky.social

28 Feb

What the "experts think" has never been so irrelevant. The field has demonstrated a complete lack of objectivity on the issue. It even has trouble talking about it. What matters is the evidence and covid aligns unnaturally close to their research. bsky.app/profile/quis...

quisp65.bsky.social@quisp65.bsky.social

There is a basic logic that's always missed in this nonsense. The only thing that can demonstrate a natural spillover is an animal host and a path to Wuhan and we are missing that. If they find a natural reservoir, their favored hypothesis only becomes on equal footing to an accident.

quisp65.bsky.social

@quisp65.bsky.social

28 Feb

Because a lab leak can produce everything nature can and the lab might have done minimal work with a natural virus IF they find the animal host. Alignment with their research can't be taken away. This issue is a 2 part problem. 1. Biosafety 2. A field's biased assessment over it's accidents

Florian Karolinus

@karolinus.bsky.social

28 Feb

To put it briefly: the Chinese government has not provided the slightest evidence to refute the theory of a laboratory leak, nor has it cooperated with WHO staff in this regard.