Post

The follow up this morning from the director of @furryweekend.com was about as bad of a non-apology as anyone could ask for. They stated that there were 15 staff on the con and despite having a full time dedicated office and being a for-profit con 🧵

Julie Ann of Rohan@ocaptmycapt.com

Capping this off to say, it’s a real eye opener when events fail. Vendors are in many ways your staff. They’re collaborating to make your event better and are a selling point to your event. People come to an event for good vendors. As an event - failing your vendors is a HUGE deal @furryweekend.com

2 reposts12 likes

Sure did! Having been in non profits for a lot of years including having oversight on spending and being federally audited I had some QUESTIONS on their spending like how in 2023 management was paid $105k but $21k last year…. And how their IT budget ballooned from $3k in 2024 to $60k in 2025

The director blamed a number of issues on the lack of staff but failed to address the fact that staffing of the con is the direct fault of the director. No one chooses the amount of staff, staffing allocations, or who is doing what other than the director.

Further, the director also blamed many of the issues on having 300 vendors. Again, other vendors pointed out that having that many vendors was a choice by the director and not staffing to support that number of vendors is again a choice BY the director.

Let’s keep going! The director also blamed the expensive new venue for the issues arising in vendor set up and expectations but the director, dealer director, and their communications liaison failed to review policies and layout of the new venue and relay these to their vendors.

That’s all on the staff and director. Also, choice of venue was on the director - no one but the director and dealer head chose this new venue which by and large most of the vendors did not want. Trying to chalk up that there was a need for more vendors to cover the cost of the venue means