Post

rich harris
@rich-harris.dev

if you're using the `interestfor` attribute anywhere, you should know that a bunch of googlers just vandalised your site it looks _atrocious_. leaving aside the merits of the accessibility discussion (github.com/w3c/csswg-dr...), am flabbergasted that it shipped in this state. unbelievably careless

Chris Coyier@chriscoyier.net

Oh snort that happened fast.

Oliver Turner
@oliverturner.cloud

I’m not often flabbergasted, but this was an incomprehensible move… so many alternative routes to achieving the same (ahem) intent *without* retrospectively butchering people’s sites

0 reposts4 likes

rich harris
@rich-harris.dev

the message here is basically 'don't use new platform features, even if they're small progressive enhancements, until they're sufficiently widespread that even we wouldn't dare break them' which i'm not sure is a good outcome for anyone, including them

Bramus
@bram.us

bsky.app/profile/bram... …

Bramus@bram.us

Correction: this hasn't shipped. It's available behind a feature flag so that you can test things. So no, a bunch of Googlers did not vandalise your site … See this thread for details: bsky.app/profile/bram...