Post

@natehagens.bsky.social I think we should work on the terms wide boundary and narrow. I like the framing but it misses that the nested layers of reality aren't necessarily turning in the same direction. In practice it feels like projecting yourself to a possible outcome and then back engineering.

9/10/26, 4:05 pm0 reposts0 likes

OurPredicament

@ourpredicament.com

And all these different possible stories we tell are just different frames of reference on different timelines. Maybe we could use phrases like "at the bio-physical level x is happening" but at the: societal, generational, imperial, energetic, planetary or pick your poison.

OurPredicament

@ourpredicament.com

The point is that people are confused when they hear about so many separate, sometimes contradictory processes unfolding, and they deserve a framework within which they can make it all make sense. Our role as communicators, being blessed with the eyes that see, is to find the story they can hear.

OurPredicament

@ourpredicament.com

And we know that if people have a why, they can bare whatever is. Why is this all happening? That is the question that only the collapse aware can answer because only the collapse aware can admit it. That is the story we must create. What is happening, why, what should we do?