Post

One more call for feedback! Yeah, I know, I often ask for feedback but, think about it, the more you share, the better the feature. 💡Support low-quality image placeholders on the web! ➡️<img previewsrc="preview.avif" src="photo.avif"> ❓Would you use this? What capabilities do you need? Read more⬇️

patrickbrosset.comPatrick - Blurry before beautiful: image previews for the webShowing blurry previews while images are loading on the web is a very common pattern which we'd love to standardize at the browser level, so that all developers can use it with very little code and co...

One interesting thread emerged, downstream from the previewsrc attribute: 🔵 Would you use it to display unrecognizable blurs, because they're really small? 🔵 Or would you use it to show more recognizable previews, if you're willing to spend around 10x more bytes? Share your point of view here ⬇️

github.com[Image Preview for HTML Images] Do better than blurhash · Issue #1406 · MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainersBlurhash is cute and nothing else. It's close to useless even compared to CSS features we may soon get. It seems like sites are moving away from it for good reason. For example, I was sent an X lin...

1 repost2 likes

No replies yet.