Post

Neither of the people in this photograph are qualified for an academic job (see also "Professor" Bill Shorten). I like Ardern a lot, and creating a role using her experience for mentoring is great, but hospitals don't say "we've hired Nicole Kidman and Hugh Jackman to do heart surgeries this month."

Hang on... wasn't Ardern at Oxford then Harvard? Must have picked up some skills on the way along with her politics & comms. Degree from Waikato Uni. Though I reckon her stint at the U. of Arizona was probably just a semester sabbatical.

She's got skills (and unique experience) and would make a fantastic adjunct. That doesn't mean she's qualified to be a lecturer.

With the greatest of respect, that smacks of academic snobbery. Adjunct and non-academic lecturer pathways exist precisely to bring high‑level applied expertise into universities.

And again, she would make a fantastic adjunct (world class, even). I don’t think it’s snobbery to insist that academia is a highly skilled profession that requires expertise and experience, however, or that it’s a distinctive enough vocation that non-academic VCs are a problem.

Yup, non academic VC's are definitely bad! Just don't tar an experienced adjunct lecturer with the same brush ...is all I'm saying. ;)

I don't think my PhD is nearly as impressive or difficult as leading a government through a a hugely successful pandemic response, a volcanic mass casualty and one of the worst racially-motivated mass murders in recent history.

Sure, but your PhD is a lot more relevant to anything you’d actually need to teach at uni, just as I’d obviously choose Ardern’s CV over mine if you needed someone to manage a crisis.

The main requirements are demonstrably knowing what you're talking about deeply and widely and being able to successfully communicate it. I was teaching and publishing with an MA for many years. I only did the PhD to get around a largely irrelevant glass ceiling.