Post

Definitely

YES. It needs to be NASA. Return to INT'L SPACE STATION COLLABORATIVE MODEL. No one-man ownership of our future. A few other firms fall into this category: FEDERAL REGULATORY COMMISSION NOW FOR AI. THESE MEN HAVE NO RIGHT TO DICTATE TO US. @hakeem-jeffries.bsky.social @chrismurphyct.bsky.social

Operation paperclip brought von Braun to the USA without ever being prosecuted for his war crimes.

This a more detailed critical technical view on starships last flight. Besides that there are a lot of startups worldwide going into the launch business. And the US is not the only country with good engineers. Google Saturn V and Werner von Braun (sadly a Nazi engineer) www.golem.de/news/spacex-...

Grok is inside the Pentagon.

It’s over. Musk did everything he said he would do: steal the personal and financial data of all citizens through DOGE, infiltrate our military by installing Palantir, controlling the fate of millions through Starlink, then descend into a new world order. Just so he can go to Mars.

The obvious next move from Musk is to buy his own squadron of F-35's. Will the Republicans approve?

That may be. The EIC had a monopoly on the supply of tea to the colony. In the context of the original article, it's the monopoly bit that's important. So too with SpaceX.

Upside. At least there are two companies creating competition. It would be bad for there to be just one. Note: keep NASA alive.