Post

The only people who didn't understand that this is exactly what would happen were the execs at Sony and Microsoft. The entire point of a console is that it's simple, reliable and cheap. If it's not all of those things then people will find alternatives.

Mat Piscatella@matpiscatella.bsky.social

From Circana's US Retail Tracking Service: For 2026 YTD ending August, Xbox hardware unit sales are down 33% versus a year ago in the US, while PlayStation hardware units are 25% lower. Xbox YTD US hardware unit sales are at an all-time low, while PlayStation is at lowest point since 2013.

Right now on eBay there's a bunch of used Ryzen 5 5600-based PCs around $600. They play rings around a console and either Windows or Linux gives you full access to Steam. And I've seen cheap-as-fuck little ARM-based Chinese portables that can access Steam and game reliably, too.

I can only imagine how many used PCs are out there on Facebook Marketplace and Craigslist (do people still use Craigslist) And since both Microsoft and Sony neglected their exclusives, there's no huge reason to get either. Even the upcoming release of GTA VI didn't inspire an uptick in sales.

Plus, Microsoft skipped out on their mid-cycle refresh so they don't have any good reason to buy something new from them. And nobody, PC or console, has any big upgrades on the horizon. So there's like zero downside to used, because there hasn't been anything extraordinary to replace them.

All Sony and Microsoft had to do was eat the costs. Two years or so. Eat the increased cost of the consoles. They'd have kept loyal customers for life, earned a ton of goodwill, lock in sales for ages. They wouldn't have been unprofitable. They simply wouldn't have been *as* profitable. But nope.

The Steam Machine was doomed based on price alone. It was using parts that even at the entry level were years out of date. It *had* to be $600. But in the end it's really no loss to Valve because claiming an oversized slice of game sales is their bread and butter, not the hardware.

𝕯𝖆𝖓𝖓𝖞 𝕱𝖊𝖓@danfenlon.bsky.social

Its why the steam machine is such a non starter for alot of people, if im paying that much why not pay for actual pc parts

The future of gaming right now is to throw Linux on whatever random piece of hardware you have laying around and run Steam, or be a company like Nintendo that keeps an almost parasocial relationship with its customers. Microsoft and Sony have lost too much ground.

I'd say XBox is doomed before the Playstation, but that's mainly because after the bubble pops Microsoft will have to eat the costs of their association with OpenAI. That means they'll put their entire gaming division out to sea to cut costs. But without a miracle there's no way they survive.

Because most people do not want to fuck with Windows, or Linux, or drivers, or upgrades, or errors, or blue screens, or cables, or anything but "turn on, play game." It's why the market thrived for as long as it did: simple. Reliable. Cheap.

Alex B@ajxander.bsky.social

I never understood the arguments for a console over pc. Keeping a PC or Gaming laptop for 3-5 years allowed for games at £20+ on sales, downloadable indie games, modding, and a functional computer that didn't compete with the main television. Why trade that for £50+ games and a walled garden market?

6 reposts90 likes

I'm a bit late to this party, but I have always enjoyed having a physical game to add to my collection. I pretty much stopped buying PC games when they stopped physical releases, and I know I will bow out of PlayStation when its digital only.

Huh, I'm beginning to think my family was more tech-engaged than I ever realised growing up. I thought computer repair was daily life and games were a perk more athletic kids just didn't enjoy. Never rationalised it as consoles reducing barriers to entry. But that does make sense in retrospect