Post

No one *licensed* anyone to make CSAM of their kids, and the tech company that provides both the production technology and the distribution system should be prosecuted out of existence.

AkivaMCohen@akivamcohen.bsky.social

Co-signing this. Grok is out there making CSAM on request from pictures posted to the internet. And if you posted pictures of your kids to Twitter, you LICENSED Grok to do that. Take those pics down NOW

AkivaMCohen

@akivamcohen.bsky.social

7 Jan

Prosecuted, absolutely - a bends can't create a defense to a state prosecution for criminal activity. But it can and will prevent private civil action for the same conduct by the person who licensed Twitter to make any edits it wanted to those pictures. That doesn't make that the victims fault -

Robin Berjon

@robin.berjon.com

The details are finicky but I think there's a GDPR approach. Pictures are personal data of course, sexualising them could be considered special category data, children are vulnerable subjects, faking in likeness is inaccurate data, and it's very unlikely that ToS would be considered sufficient.

9/1/26, 8:27 am0 reposts2 likes

Robin Berjon

@robin.berjon.com

9 Jan

Of course this only matters in a world in which Ireland hasn't defected to the broligarchy.